CWA PAYROLL — Employee Political Donations

Employees of CWA PAYROLL donated $15K to federal campaigns from 8 donors. See party breakdown and state-by-state analysis.

Overview

$15K
Total Donated
8
Contributing Employees
$2K
Avg per Donor

Political Giving Analysis

Employees of CWA PAYROLL have collectively donated $15K to federal political campaigns, making it one of the more politically active workforces tracked in FEC filings. A total of 8 individual employees have made itemized contributions, averaging $2K per donor.

Geographically, CWA PAYROLL employee donors are concentrated in District of Columbia ($8K), followed by New York ($3K), Ohio ($1K), Kentucky ($600). This distribution typically reflects where the company has major offices and operations.

Note: These donations are made by individual employees and do not represent corporate political activity. CWA PAYROLL as an organization may have separate PAC spending or lobbying activities not reflected in individual contribution data. All data is sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.

Party Breakdown

Top States

StateAmount
District of Columbia$8K
New York$3K
Ohio$1K
Kentucky$600
California$366
Virginia$275
Texas$260
Florida$225
Michigan$175
Pennsylvania$140

Frequently Asked Questions

How much have CWA PAYROLL employees donated to political campaigns?

8 employees of CWA PAYROLL have donated a total of $15K to federal political campaigns. The average donation per employee is $2K.

Which party do CWA PAYROLL employees favor?

CWA PAYROLL employee donations break down as: .

Where are CWA PAYROLL employee donors located?

CWA PAYROLL employee donors are spread across multiple states. The top states by donation volume are: District of Columbia ($8K), New York ($3K), Ohio ($1K), Kentucky ($600), California ($366).

Where does this employer donation data come from?

All data is sourced from FEC public filings. Federal law requires committees to report the employer of individuals who contribute more than $200 in an election cycle. CWA PAYROLL as an organization does not necessarily endorse these contributions.