LASH GROUP, LLC — Employee Political Donations

Employees of LASH GROUP, LLC donated $30K to federal campaigns from 7 donors. See party breakdown and state-by-state analysis.

Overview

$30K
Total Donated
7
Contributing Employees
$4K
Avg per Donor

Political Giving Analysis

Employees of LASH GROUP, LLC have collectively donated $30K to federal political campaigns, making it one of the more politically active workforces tracked in FEC filings. A total of 7 individual employees have made itemized contributions, averaging $4K per donor.

Geographically, LASH GROUP, LLC employee donors are concentrated in South Carolina ($12K), followed by Maryland ($9K), Florida ($6K), North Carolina ($3K). This distribution typically reflects where the company has major offices and operations.

Note: These donations are made by individual employees and do not represent corporate political activity. LASH GROUP, LLC as an organization may have separate PAC spending or lobbying activities not reflected in individual contribution data. All data is sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.

Party Breakdown

Top States

StateAmount
South Carolina$12K
Maryland$9K
Florida$6K
North Carolina$3K
Texas$504
Indiana$304

Frequently Asked Questions

How much have LASH GROUP, LLC employees donated to political campaigns?

7 employees of LASH GROUP, LLC have donated a total of $30K to federal political campaigns. The average donation per employee is $4K.

Which party do LASH GROUP, LLC employees favor?

LASH GROUP, LLC employee donations break down as: .

Where are LASH GROUP, LLC employee donors located?

LASH GROUP, LLC employee donors are spread across multiple states. The top states by donation volume are: South Carolina ($12K), Maryland ($9K), Florida ($6K), North Carolina ($3K), Texas ($504).

Where does this employer donation data come from?

All data is sourced from FEC public filings. Federal law requires committees to report the employer of individuals who contribute more than $200 in an election cycle. LASH GROUP, LLC as an organization does not necessarily endorse these contributions.