POCKET GEMS — Employee Political Donations

Employees of POCKET GEMS donated $29K to federal campaigns from 6 donors. See party breakdown and state-by-state analysis.

Overview

$29K
Total Donated
6
Contributing Employees
$5K
Avg per Donor

Political Giving Analysis

Employees of POCKET GEMS have collectively donated $29K to federal political campaigns, making it one of the more politically active workforces tracked in FEC filings. A total of 6 individual employees have made itemized contributions, averaging $5K per donor.

POCKET GEMS employees overwhelmingly favor the Democratic Party, directing 100% of all donations ($9K) to Democratic candidates and committees. This strong partisan lean is consistent across the workforce.

Geographically, POCKET GEMS employee donors are concentrated in California ($29K). This distribution typically reflects where the company has major offices and operations.

Note: These donations are made by individual employees and do not represent corporate political activity. POCKET GEMS as an organization may have separate PAC spending or lobbying activities not reflected in individual contribution data. All data is sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.

Party Breakdown

DEM$9K (100%)
Democratic Donations ($9K)

Top States

StateAmount
California$29K

Frequently Asked Questions

How much have POCKET GEMS employees donated to political campaigns?

6 employees of POCKET GEMS have donated a total of $29K to federal political campaigns. The average donation per employee is $5K.

Which party do POCKET GEMS employees favor?

POCKET GEMS employee donations break down as: DEM: $9K.

Where are POCKET GEMS employee donors located?

POCKET GEMS employee donors are spread across multiple states. The top states by donation volume are: California ($29K).

Where does this employer donation data come from?

All data is sourced from FEC public filings. Federal law requires committees to report the employer of individuals who contribute more than $200 in an election cycle. POCKET GEMS as an organization does not necessarily endorse these contributions.